Board Development Argumentative Thesis

Topics: Board of directors, Corporate governance, Management Pages: 6 (2219 words) Published: August 3, 2013
ABSTRACT
An active, well-informed, well-trained Board of Directors (BOD) is absolutely essential to the success of the organization. The BOD for this organization is not unlike any other not-for-profit boards with less than 10 years in age. The boards of these organizations sometimes consist of inexperienced and unknowledgeable management professionals. New board members are excited to make good decisions and evoke proper change within the organization. They soon find out change is not quick and results aren’t seen over night. Due to this reality board members with tenure can become complacent and thereby miss opportunities for organizational growth. This can create barriers to performance for young board members and old board members alike. This paper argues the necessity of continual board development using assessment methodologies. It takes into consideration current knowledge on why and how development can detour ineffective job performance amongst board participants. This paper creates a possible framework for BOD development in non-profits.

OUTLINE

Introduction and Overview4
Evidence or Support Statements5
Warrants6
Counterclaim Statement7
Rebuttal Statement8
Conclusion Statement9
References11

Introduction and Overview
Board members are a significant asset to organizations. They make decisions based on strategic need and corporate responsibility. Rarely though do new members arrive on the board with years of experience in the nonprofit sector (Rubenstein and O’Flynn, 2006). The literature displays that new board members often receive little or no training regarding how to serve as a successful member of the board of directors. Nonprofit boards typically are comprised of many successful leaders from for-profit or related entities. Most often they will have only a consumer’s view of what a particular nonprofit is all about, but possess lots of passion for the mission of the organization. Consequently, regular education of board members about their important role and knowledge should be a high priority. Rubenstein and O’Flynn argued, “Today, in the new environment Boards must be proactive, investigative, accountable, and actually govern a company or nonprofit organization, no serious company or nonprofit organization can omit Board training” (p. 150). Beyond orientation the nominative committee should be developing board members through assessment methodologies. This is a priority in order to detour ineffective job performance amongst stale membership and to develop new members’ sense of the organization. This paper suggests board development can exist inside assessment methods granting improved overall effectiveness of governance. Currently, there is a lack of consistent attendance at meetings. There has also been a challenge of motivating more tenured board members. Ultimately this has effected strategic implementation and has slowed the expansion of the organization. Thesis: Board development involving yearly assessments to further develop a sense of responsibility and purpose amongst members will strengthen and rejuvenate board members thereby meeting organizational goals and objectives. The board should undertake a formal and rigorous annual assessment of its own performance and that of its committees and individual directors. Evidence / Support Statement

An accurate board assessment process can identify issues and enact reforms to improve performance. Currently there is no measurement taken when it comes to BOD performance. Salamon (2002), paints a rather dark picture of the quality of many nonprofit boards in the same circumstances. The author speaks to the confidence communities have about the nonprofit sector. To combat what the author calls, “the effectiveness challenge,” nonprofits boards are now are looking to development as a crucial way to balance between survival and distinctiveness. Survival is needed in a time of crisis where donors aren’t giving as generously....

References: Copp, B. (January 1996) Evaluating Board Performance. University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives. Retrieved July 20, 2013 from http://www.uwcc.wisc.edu/issues/Governance/board.html
Furr, R
Herman, R., Renz, D., & Heimovics, R. (1997) Board Practice and Board Effectiveness in Local Nonprofit Organizations. Jossey-Bass Publishers
Lang, A
National Council of Nonprofits. Article on Board Development. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://www.councilofnonprofits.org/node/5676
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2011)
Rubenstein, H., & O’Flynn, P. (2006). The role of training for boards of directors. The CEO Refresher. pp. 150. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://www.refresher.com.
Salamon, L. (2002). The Sate of Non-profit America. Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C.
The Plunkett Foundation (March 1994). Developing Directors of Cooperatives and Other Similar Enterprises.
Tichy, N. M. & Bennis, W.G. (October 2007) Making Judgment Calls. The Harvard Business Review. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://hbr.org/2007/10/making-judgment-calls/ar/1
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Thesis Essay
  • thesis Essay
  • thesis Essay
  • Thesis Essay
  • Free Response and Thesis Development Essay
  • Boards Essay
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Argumentative Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free
Binbou Shimai Monogatari English Subbed | Marina Inoue | Annabelle (2014)